When I was younger I rode off-road a lot. I was semi-serious about it and even rode in sanctioned Enduros for a few years. A lot has changed since then. I'm older of course and a lot more adverse to injury (it takes much longer to heal now) and there is not nearly so much land open now for off-roading as there used to be. Nowadays, I'm more interested in simply exploring the National Forest Service and many other unpaved roads that criss-cross the Appalachians like spider webs in my part of the country. I'd been thinking about a large displacement, street-legal, dual sport to do some "adventure touring" for quite a while and when my work declined to 3 days/week in March of 2003 I decided it was time to find a suitable ride to fill my now more plentiful "spare" time. I wanted a dual sport large enough to ride to nearby (within a half day's ride) unpaved roads and trails rather than loading up a trailer or pickup. That pretty much narrowed the field to the 600/650cc singles from Kawasaki, Honda, Suzuki and BMW. I also didn't want to put a lot of money in the bike and that essentially eliminated all the late model bikes. I'm pretty handy and so what I thought I needed was and old, but not destroyed, "fixer-upper". And, although I'm really partial to Hondas, there aren't as many XR600/650s around as KLRs so I focused on the Kaw. That was when I found this old trooper on eBay.
This one was in pretty sad shape having a broken rear shock, non-working electric starter and various other lesser problems. Not to mention it looked like crap with a rusty dent in the gas tank, bent handlebars and a broken rear fender from some previous owner's misguided wheelie. Even so, I took a chance that, like Lazarus, it could be raised from the dead and I bought it for $540. The only problem was that it was in west Texas (about 1500 miles away).
BEFORE
AFTER
The KLR650 was introduced in 1987 with an engine that is essentially the same as this one except for a larger bore and stroke. However, the 650 chassis is completely different from this machine. It turns out the '84-'86 KLR600 chassis is more like the current KLR250 although heavier because of the larger engine and electric start. That's not all bad since this bike is a bit lighter than the KLR650 and you might say a bit more oriented towards the off-road side of dual sporting than the more "streetable" 650.
2005 KLR250 | 1986 KLR600 | 2005 KRL650 | |
Wheelbase | 55.7 in | 57.9 in | 58.9 in |
Seat height | 33.7 in | 34.3 in | 35.0 in |
Ground Clearance | 10.6 in | 11.0 in | 9.4 in |
Dry Weight | 258 lbs | 322 lbs. | 338 lbs |
Curb Weight | 293 lbs | 357 lbs | 392 lbs |
Fuel Capacity | 2.9 gal | 3.0 gal | 6.1 gal |
Front Brake | disc | disc | disc |
Rear Brake | drum | drum | disc |
Front Travel | 9.1 in | 9.1 in | 9.1 in |
Rear Travel | 9.1 in | 8.7 in | 9.1 in |
Given that I knew going in this was a fairly heavy bike the biggest criticism I have for it is that the stock brakes are woefully inadequate. This was greatly improved by substituting a steel braided brake line for the original loonnnngg rubber one. It's still no sport bike when it comes to stopping but the firm feel of the front brake with the steel line inspires a lot more confidence.
Let's go exploring!
Post Script
The KLR600 suffered catastrophic engine failure in 2004 when the cam chain tensioner failed and allowed the cam chain to "skip time" on the crankshaft sprocket. This resulted in the exhaust valves colliding with the piston. I had the head repaired (two new valves and guides, all four seals and reseating of the intake valves). While I had it apart, I replaced the rings and, of course, the failed cam chain tensioner with the more robust design used on late model KLR650s. It was running strong when I sold it to an eager college student and replaced it with a 1999 KLR650.